We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Here's How D-Wave Quantum's Profitability Remains Under Pressure
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
D-Wave Quantum expects most 2026 revenues in Q4 as two annealing systems reach acceptance milestones.
QBTS expenses remain elevated as R&D, G&A and sales and marketing costs continue to rise.
D-Wave Quantum's recurring QCaaS revenues are not yet large enough to offset volatile system sales.
D-Wave Quantum’s (QBTS - Free Report) revenues remain uneven and dependent on large system contracts, making quarterly performance susceptible to volatility. System sales fell to just $0.3 million in the first half of 2026 from $13.7 million a year earlier.
The company expects most fiscal 2026 revenues in the fourth quarter as two annealing systems reach acceptance milestones. Any delays in installation or calibration could defer some of these revenues to 2027. Although backlog and deferred revenues provide some future visibility, recurring QCaaS revenues are not yet large enough to offset fluctuations in system sales.
Additionally, D-Wave’s gate-model business is at an early stage, with targets extending through 2032 and requiring continued progress in device fabrication, packaging and control-system scaling. Delays in foundry capacity, multi-chip interconnects or customer adoption could further postpone gate-model QCaaS revenues and system sales.
Expense intensity also remains high as the company funds both near-term commercialization and a multi-year technology roadmap. Second-quarter 2026 operating expenses rose 93% year over year, led by higher R&D, G&A and sales and marketing costs, including increased headcount, stock-based compensation and acquisition-related amortization. The company expects these expenses to remain elevated, making stronger recurring revenue growth important for improving profitability.
Peer Update
IonQ’s (IONQ - Free Report) revenue recognition depends on delivery schedules and performance obligations, even though larger platform agreements increase contract size and product breadth. In the second quarter, remaining performance obligations increased to $485 million from $470 million in the first quarter.
However, about half is expected to convert to revenues within the next 12 months. IonQ continues to report significant losses as it invests in R&D and manufacturing. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $120.3 million in the second quarter, while R&D expenses rose to $160.6 million, keeping profitability dependent on stronger revenue growth. Also, IonQ’s roadmap depends on successful fabrication, commissioning and deployment of next-generation systems. Any delay could increase costs and defer revenue recognition.
Rigetti’s (RGTI - Free Report) revenue profile remains tied to the timing of system deliveries and milestone-based development work rather than recurring commercial usage. Revenues reached $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2026, up from $1.8 million a year earlier, driven mainly by sales of 9-qubit Novera systems and related products.
However, concentration remains high, with one customer accounting for 64% of second-quarter 2026 revenues and another for 16%. Rigetti continues to fund a large research and infrastructure program against a small revenue base.
Operating expenses rose 48% year over year to $30.3 million, including a 53% increase in R&D to $20.7 million. Rigetti’s path to quantum advantage still requires simultaneous progress in scale, fidelity, coherence, controls and error correction.
QBTS’ Price Performance
Over the past year, QBTS’ shares have lost 10.5% compared with the broader Internet Software industry’s 10.6% decline. The S&P composite has risen 16.2% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
QBTS’ Expensive Valuation
QBTS currently trades at a forward 12-month Price-to-Sales (P/S) of 88.18X compared with the industry average of 4.16X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
QBTS Stock Estimate Trend
In the past 30 days, the company’s loss per share estimate for 2026 has remained unchanged.
Image: Bigstock
Here's How D-Wave Quantum's Profitability Remains Under Pressure
Key Takeaways
D-Wave Quantum’s (QBTS - Free Report) revenues remain uneven and dependent on large system contracts, making quarterly performance susceptible to volatility. System sales fell to just $0.3 million in the first half of 2026 from $13.7 million a year earlier.
The company expects most fiscal 2026 revenues in the fourth quarter as two annealing systems reach acceptance milestones. Any delays in installation or calibration could defer some of these revenues to 2027. Although backlog and deferred revenues provide some future visibility, recurring QCaaS revenues are not yet large enough to offset fluctuations in system sales.
Additionally, D-Wave’s gate-model business is at an early stage, with targets extending through 2032 and requiring continued progress in device fabrication, packaging and control-system scaling. Delays in foundry capacity, multi-chip interconnects or customer adoption could further postpone gate-model QCaaS revenues and system sales.
Expense intensity also remains high as the company funds both near-term commercialization and a multi-year technology roadmap. Second-quarter 2026 operating expenses rose 93% year over year, led by higher R&D, G&A and sales and marketing costs, including increased headcount, stock-based compensation and acquisition-related amortization. The company expects these expenses to remain elevated, making stronger recurring revenue growth important for improving profitability.
Peer Update
IonQ’s (IONQ - Free Report) revenue recognition depends on delivery schedules and performance obligations, even though larger platform agreements increase contract size and product breadth. In the second quarter, remaining performance obligations increased to $485 million from $470 million in the first quarter.
However, about half is expected to convert to revenues within the next 12 months. IonQ continues to report significant losses as it invests in R&D and manufacturing. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $120.3 million in the second quarter, while R&D expenses rose to $160.6 million, keeping profitability dependent on stronger revenue growth. Also, IonQ’s roadmap depends on successful fabrication, commissioning and deployment of next-generation systems. Any delay could increase costs and defer revenue recognition.
Rigetti’s (RGTI - Free Report) revenue profile remains tied to the timing of system deliveries and milestone-based development work rather than recurring commercial usage. Revenues reached $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2026, up from $1.8 million a year earlier, driven mainly by sales of 9-qubit Novera systems and related products.
However, concentration remains high, with one customer accounting for 64% of second-quarter 2026 revenues and another for 16%. Rigetti continues to fund a large research and infrastructure program against a small revenue base.
Operating expenses rose 48% year over year to $30.3 million, including a 53% increase in R&D to $20.7 million. Rigetti’s path to quantum advantage still requires simultaneous progress in scale, fidelity, coherence, controls and error correction.
QBTS’ Price Performance
Over the past year, QBTS’ shares have lost 10.5% compared with the broader Internet Software industry’s 10.6% decline. The S&P composite has risen 16.2% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
QBTS’ Expensive Valuation
QBTS currently trades at a forward 12-month Price-to-Sales (P/S) of 88.18X compared with the industry average of 4.16X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
QBTS Stock Estimate Trend
In the past 30 days, the company’s loss per share estimate for 2026 has remained unchanged.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
QBTS stock currently has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.